Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cynwoody 4648 days ago
Well, there is FastMail† (which was recently spun back off of Opera). You can get a good web mail service without ads in return for a modest subscription fee.

So, as a Gmail user, you have a choice. Free, but you get to see dumpster ads because the email was about dumping some stuff off a database. Or on your credit card, because you don't want silicon being any more aware of your email bits than absolutely necessary to show them to you.

It should be up to you, the user, not Judge Koh!

†https://www.fastmail.fm/signup/personal.html

I'm sticking with Gmail.

2 comments

>. It should be up to you, the user, not Judge Koh!

I'm sticking with Gmail.

whatever happens with the case appeal after appeal time will tell, but a group of users sued Google for the things mentioned in the lawsuit. So the judge didn't wake up one day and pick on Gmail for no reason, there was a lawsuit by users--not all Gmail users share your opinions--and the judge had to decide on a few things.

My guess is that most users don't know what happens to their email (scan and advertising profiles based on the content of emails) because Google isn't exactly publicizing this for obvious reasons. So that will play a role and they are way of testing this via scientific surveys and polls. As long as people know and consent to this, Google will have no problem. For example, you can record a conversation as long as the other person consent to it. Who and how they consented if the did, is the $64k question.

That's fine for you, because you understand the trade offs.

The allegation is that many users have been duped.