|
|
|
|
|
by reddiric
4645 days ago
|
|
There's lots of liability you can't skirt by saying it's implied that the other person consented. It seems like saying someone consented to waving the accessibility rights afforded under the ADA because it was a condition of patronizing the store. And I don't follow why you think once you have a reason to use data for one purpose, you automatically have the right to use it for any purpose. |
|