Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by epistasis 4637 days ago
Good idea, this definitely accomplishes the same functionality, but it's done at runtime, rather than the compiler knowing all the functions at compile time. Perhaps a minor difference for most cases, though...

I would still prefer a C extension... Perhaps I should just use Go these days, though ironically all these memory allocation policies are useless in a GC language.

1 comments

You underestimate the compiler. This formulation might be tricky, but the version I just posted (adjacent to this post) definitely leaves the compiler knowing exactly what's going to be called when the function exits.