|
|
|
|
|
by pjmlp
4650 days ago
|
|
Just kind of. Most enterprise customers I have worked with, favour dynamic languages just for scripting tasks, while using static typed ones for the large scale projects. By large scale, I mean, projects with at least three development sites, at least 30 developers, all the different set of skills. With lots of attrition. The only time I saw it working, was in a project done with TCL, which lacks optional types, but everyone on team was a top developer, the team was small, and located on the same open space. So startup world, not enterprise. |
|