|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
4644 days ago
|
|
|
> Are they indicating that when someone sends an e-mail to a Gmail account that they are implicitly consenting to the 'eavesdropping'? No, not at all. There are, per the order, three requirements identified for a 632 violation: "(1) an electronic recording of or eavesdropping on (2) a 'confidential communication' (3) to which all parties did not consent." The order finds the plaintiffs' case deficient on this point because: "Plaintiffs have not established that the
communications at issue are confidential pursuant to section 632." |
|
|