[speeder]

I could not find all my numbers again.

Also remember that mid-2011 Symbian manufacturing stopped (thus all new sales at the end of the year were of old phones already shipped).

Yet from your own link, it states that Symbian still was ahead of iOS.

Anyway, I DO have numbers from Brazil: http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/03/android-smartphone-sales-le...

(some other numbers I had were also from Kantar, unfortunately their site is TERRIBLE)

Note that in 2012 Brazil STILL HAD 22% of new Smartphones being Symbian.

Also, several other countries in 2011 still had some good Symbian numbers (like first or second place).

Suddenly stopping selling Symbian to switch to WP7 made no sense, even worse when claimed it was to make it different (when other manufacturers ALSO made WP7 phones).

I just wish I could find the 2010 and 2011 numbers for all the BRICS again, but today that is seemly very hard :(

[HelloMcFly]

I think what I take issue with is referring to any device running a Symbian OS as a "smart phone". Many Symbian phones were just "feature phones", and this is probably (though I can't prove it) especially true in BRICS countries. It's not really a fair comparison. We've got little reason to believe Nokia's fate would have been any different in those markets as they developed than it was anywhere else.

Plus, did you ever use an actual Symbian smart phone? I used this one for a bit (http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/nokia-e7-dark-gray/4505-...) and it was just terrible. And it was probably one of the top 5 best Symbian models!

[speeder]

My family owned several of them.

We really liked them... Powerful enough to play a J2ME port of Counter-Strike but affordable.

iOS is still beyond 90% of the population income or somehing like that.