|
|
|
|
|
by rnbennett
4651 days ago
|
|
While I've been out of the .NET game for a year or so, I'm aware of the ecosystem. There's a lot of great libraries out there, that make the experience considerably better. Companies on the Microsoft stack tend to be extremely conservative. I hardly ever see anyone using these ORMs - I see LINQ-to-SQL or EF, or just as often, inline SQL using DataSets in codebehinds. I don't think that companies should immediately jump on the next great technology, however there are plenty of companies sitting around on WebForms based on .NET 2.0 (2005) and .NET 3.5 (2007), and a few still on .NET 1.1 (2003). The only reason these companies have not moved onto ASP.NET MVC (or anything else) is because of the sheer cost of doing so. With that comes all of the negatives discussed in the post. |
|