|
|
|
|
|
by smilekzs
4648 days ago
|
|
The core seems much more interesting than the Pawn language. I'd like to see more comparisons once this matures. A few points: 1. I'd like to see the FFI implemented natively (i.e. by declaring in Solid and registering through C code/macro, instead of relying on object file parsing). Then it'll be extremely useful in a bare-metal microcontroller environment. 2. Namespacing is needed -- I don't really want `parse_xxx` or `ast_node` in my global namespace! |
|