|
|
|
|
|
by ajross
4653 days ago
|
|
The code in question (see the LWN link elsewhere in this discussion) actually had parens around the expression (in a context where they looked "normal") and wouldn't have generated a warning. That said, I agree with huhtenberg above that twisting the language conventions around to deal with this is never going to fix anything. Subtle code remains subtle in all languages, and subtle code is where security bugs lie. You can't fix "subtle" with a rulebook. |
|