[bsullivan01]

Why aren't you asking them for their qualifications, then?

Don't need to, checked them as they posted their names and all their research is online. http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5605

They also posted the math behind it (which went over my head) unlike you. Next time, if you want to be taken seriously explain yourself better and try to be specific. If you know what you are talking about, of course.

[redhat-reallyp]

You're comparing me to the authors of the work? My misunderstanding then, I thought you were comparing my take to that of other commenters.

"try to be specific"

I did post specifics, include a link to an example of the issues with supersymmetry as a physical model.

"explain yourself better"

If you can identify what you didn't understand, I'd be happy to explain it further. I stand by my comment - it doesn't contain anything non-factual that can't be supported with references, although when it comes to silly metaphysical claims about the universe arising from pure geometry, those references are going to be to philosophy texts, not science texts. Which hints at the problem with the claim in the first place.