|
|
|
|
|
by rayiner
4666 days ago
|
|
I'm not going to say I think our existing system is without flaws, but here's some food for thought: pop media is a wholesome product. It doesn't destroy the environment like Apple's or Samsung's phones. It doesn't con people into giving up personal information like Facebook. It doesn't take advantage of desperate third world labor like everything Wal-Mart sells. It doesn't use up scarce resources like gasoline production, contribute substantially to our carbon footprint like shipping, pollute precious water resources like manufacturing, clog up our rivers like farming. It doesn't destroy our precarious fish stocks like the seafood restaurant I went to last night. Music and movies are actually priced so most people can afford them, unlike say life-saving drugs or medical care. So even if we're reevaluating the basics of our economy, it seems to me like music and movies are among the last things that deserve our philosophical ire. |
|
"Looking at the 44 concerts, U2 will create enough carbon to fly all 90,000 people attending one of their Wembley dates (in London) to Dublin," Helen Roberts, an environmental consultant for carbonfootprint.com, told the Belfast Telegraph. Put another way, U2's CO2 emissions are reportedly the equivalent to the average annual waste produced by 6,500 British people, or the same as leaving a lightbulb running for 159,000 years. [1]
> It doesn't con people into giving up personal information like Facebook.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/arts/music/jay-z-is-watchi...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootki...
> It doesn't take advantage of desperate third world labor like everything Wal-Mart sells.
Wal-Mart sells pop media.
[1]: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/jul/10/u2-world-tour-c...