[jessedhillon]

Nice.

Don't add anything useful like, say, why you think it's terrible. Just go ahead and post a passive-aggressive, oblique insult at my life experience and what I've learned from it.

Bonus points for framing it in a way that asserts your right to exercise an option I clearly articulated and invited you to in my first sentence.

I don't know why OP is concerned about keeping his kids away from chat roulette. Seems to me that HN is the home of the dicks.

[alphakappa]

You are right. It's normal to want to shield kids from sexual imagery because we are fearful for their supposedly pure minds. However, from my own experience (and of friends) , we all saw sexual stuff growing up. Porn, erotica, suggestive imagery in movies (that wanted to avoid showing sex, but it's not like we kids were fooled) and outright sex in the few R-rated stuff we saw anyway.

I don't believe any of those affected me in a negative way. It would be weirder to be shielded from all that, and then suddenly be exposed to what the real world is like when you leave for college.

[stephengillie]

My parents caused way more harm to me by trying to shield me than any sexual scene could have caused. I've spent years just trying to convince myself that I'm allowed to express that I'm attracted to women.

[jfarmer]

> Just go ahead and post a passive-aggressive, oblique insult at my life experience and what I've learned from it.

This runs the risk of being pedantic, but that comment was neither oblique nor passive-aggressive. It was just plain aggressive.