| I agree that the kinect is more convenient for casual gaming. That said, I have yet to see a convincing demo of the new Kinect, so far only having seen increased resolution on the depth visualisation. By the very nature of the technology it will still have the same limitations as its predecessor. The technology in the PrioVR may be a more cumbersome than ideal, but the proposed sensors are already smaller than those shown in the visualisation (http://i.imgur.com/oSBEloE.png - the middle ones are the new sensors). As for further miniaturisation, well it has to start somewhere (hence kickstarter, i guess). As for power usage, this kind of device (low powered sensors with a single wireless hub) combined with a mobile phone and some kind of communication bridge would likely give you hours of full-system use (the PrioVR, this: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2041280918/vrase-the-sma... for display and some bridge to access the mocap data on the phone) off a simple 5Ah battery.
Or you could go the oculus route, and just have a laptop in a backpack, powering everything through USB. This isn't just about gaming. This is capturing full body movement for usage in a huge variety of applications. I'm worried that given the current traction this project has, it will fail to fund, and we're going to end up setting back immersive AR/VR for another decade. |
I doubt that you could get hours of gameplay. Maybe if you were playing something very simple, you could do hours, but a fully immersive world would destroy battery life.