You'll need a replacement theory/model though.
Wait, what??
I. points out incoherence. {first he says show it isn't happening, then he assumes it's happening but it stops or reverses}
II. you could show warming is not happening this way (data)
III. if it was warming and then started reversing falsification might happen this way (new theory/model)
IV. additional considerations about falsification
I. points out incoherence. {first he says show it isn't happening, then he assumes it's happening but it stops or reverses}
II. you could show warming is not happening this way (data)
III. if it was warming and then started reversing falsification might happen this way (new theory/model)
IV. additional considerations about falsification