|
|
|
|
|
by jlarocco
4656 days ago
|
|
> Can you state this in a mathematically precise notation? Big-O isn't meant to be precise. The entire point is to roughly describe algorithm behavior. > 'Implied +C' is pretty much nonsense. Implied +C is built in to the definition of big-O notation. As n increases towards infinity the influence of C becomes negligible, so it's left off. Read the first chapter of any algorithms book. |
|