|
|
|
|
|
|
by bsenftner
4663 days ago
|
|
|
Not to imply that this technology is anything short of fantastic, if you look closely at the video again you will notice fairly obvious artifacts when an object is 'moved' from it's original location - the background replacement is only so good from a single image. Likewise, the 3D objects themselves created by this system show unrealistic artifacts. I'd like to see the results after they expand this system for multi-photo input, of the type used in film with multiple images from a moving camera. My point being, this is a fantastic combination of known technologies to create something truly new, and with refinement will be suitable for feature film work. However, as it is shown in the video, not high enough quality for VFX applications. (Disclaimer: VFX pipeline developer here.) |
|
|
Sure, understood.
The thing is, I imagine film VFX guys are already doing this kind of task—making 3D versions of real objects from the movie and doing CGI additions from them—and tools like this (with, as you say, refinements) could be a great help in speeding up that process...