|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
4660 days ago
|
|
> the reason he gave was that it was against "the rules" That's not how I see it at all. He informed you that there was not a jacket rule. He did not in fact make up any rules or tell you anything about said rules or in fact acknowledge that there are table-reserving rules. I don't understand where you're coming from. |
|