[pj]

Maybe it's the removing of the DRM that is evil? I mean, it is there to protect the producer and help the producer ensure a stream of revenue and an incentive to produce more content for you in the future.

Would you want a future without content worth buying? Why can't you just live with the DRM?

[jrockway]

I wrote a book. It was un-DRM'd and made available for download on various Bittorrent trackers. I still made plenty of money.

Next time, I refuse to inflict DRM on my users. It only hurts the people that actually pay. The people that pirate it aren't inconvenienced by DRM at all. That is pretty fucked up, IMHO.

[bjelkeman-again]

And how do you create a DRM that doesn't suck?

Dead tree books have DRM which works, albeit in a shape which isn't digital. It is a pain to copy a 300 page novel, but you can do it (there are of course copyright limitations). But all DRM systems implemented fail in comparison. Of course, comparing the two directly is hard as they are very different media.

Books work well because: - they don't stop working when the DRM vendor goes out of business (see all the music sites now gone) - you can give them and lend them without problems - they are compatible (i.e. you changing to a new computing platform doesn't mean that you can't now read your books)

When the convenience of electronic distribution with DRM overcomes the drawbacks then you are going to see some uptake, but the drawbacks seem too large at this point.

To have a future with content worth buying, then maybe the business model needs to change? However, book readings aren't quite as attractive as touring bands. So that is going to take some good thinking. :)

[pj]

How do you create an honest society? Which is easier, DRM that doesn't suck, or consumers who don't "share?" I don't know the answer.

I think we are entering an age of consciousness. The realization that we can lie is a natural stage of maturation, a later stage is the realization that lying has negative consequences. Maybe we as a digital society need to go through a similar stage of honest consumerism. Buying things, not because we are forced to, but because we want to give producers an incentive to produce.

We could all smash windows, steal cars, bump locks... security is an illusion. We can defeat it if we want to, but we don't have to. We can all win. Life is not a zero sum game.

A balance will be achieved. If it is not achieved, then the producers will simply stop producing and life will be worse for all of us or at least for the producers or perhaps the distributors.

I don't have the answers, but we are raised to know that stealing is wrong. Honesty is the best policy. Golden rule.

Sounds simplistic, perhaps naive, but maybe that's the answer. Personally, I stopped stealing music a long time ago. Now I listen to streaming radio online or I flip through Youtube videos from the distributors' channels or that kind of thing.

My point is, there are "honest" alternatives to stealing products, digital or otherwise.

I don't know why we create this sense of us versus them. We share this planet. If you make my life better, I want you to be around to continue making it better and I know you need to eat. I think that's the answer. Build a sense of community around the product, the producer, the consumer and the future where we all benefit from our shared existence.

[asciilifeform]

> How do you create an honest society?

How about wiping out all forms of artificial scarcity?

[stcredzero]

I think we are entering an age of consciousness.

In the same way, we are always in "Eternal September." Also, Gallium Arsenide: The Technology of the Future. Always Was. Always Will Be.

Maybe we'll hit a wall at the Singularity. I think it will be like hitting a too-low speedbump at highway speed: by then we'll be going too fast to notice it much.