[SideburnsOfDoom]

That would be ideal, yes. But you could start with avoiding predictable offence to large percentage of people.

[WayneDB]

Please prove to me that the majority of women or even a large portion are offended. Nobody has done that yet.

Furthermore, even if you could prove that - percentage has nothing to do with it. That is a completely arbitrary qualifier. Offending people is a birth given right. Get over it.

[SideburnsOfDoom]

Now you're just trolling. Given the response that occurred in the media and in general, I suggest that you prove the opposite.

[WayneDB]

> Now you're just trolling.

What the fuck does that even mean?

> Given the response that occurred in the media and in general...

The media is your measuring stick? The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? That's rich. You should probably go think about that some more.

You and all the whiners just like you are the ones complaining about tit jokes, so you prove it.

[SideburnsOfDoom]

> The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion?

In my opinion? Citation needed.

> You and all the whiners just like you

Sweeping generalisation.

So to be clear, you're saying that there's no fuss being made, and also it's being made by "whiners"?

[WayneDB]

Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not in your opinion or not?

Why not just tell me the truth instead of asking me to cite you on your own opinion?

(I just can't imagine that you think "the media" is any better than this titstare app. Have you watched TV before?)

[SideburnsOfDoom]

Seeing as I never gave any opinion on the question of "Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not", it's irrelevant, despite you erroneously attributing that to me. It's a derailing tactic.