|
|
|
|
|
by edw519
4667 days ago
|
|
...when I asked my coworker to explain...why is the code shit, I couldn't get a straight answer. Maybe because there are only so many straight answers and we get tired of repeating them so often... Class A: It's too difficult for the next programmer to understand this - poor (or horrible) variable naming
- poor (or horrible) function naming
- repeated repeated repeated repeated code
- comments don't match code
- comments needed but not there
- comments needed by unintelligible
- unbalanced structure
- poor (or horrible) choices for iterations
- poor (or horrible) choices for conditionals
- poor (or horrible) choices for data design/storage
- poorly maintained by Programmers #2 thru x, who didn't understand it
- etc., etc., etc.
Class B: Poor machine performance, not by 10%, but by 10000%, because of extremely poor design and development choices.Class C: It's broken. Insufficiently tested & broken in production. |
|