|
|
|
|
|
|
by foobarbazqux
4674 days ago
|
|
|
Actually I think Wikipedia is pretty good for tricky questions, in that they attract a lot of attention and receive a lot of edits. If being a scientist is determined by the consensus of one's peers, it seems like it makes sense to accept an article defining what scientists are that is written as a consensus opinion. But anyway, if you think it's wrong, why don't you edit it? |
|
|