Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kasey_junk 4672 days ago
I get that, but again, doesn't that fall under illegal trading behavior? If we are going to assume that the brokerages are rampantly front running, why assume they are even telling the truth about execution.

At that point they can just tell you that your trades executed that way without the bother of actually going into the market.

Further, why would you stay on an execution platform that is so obviously bad for you?

1 comments

I don't think it's illegal, not even really front-running. That'd be them turning a price profit on filling your order, not just using it to avoid a potential loss.

Also, you're right, at a minimum, via a subsidiary it's possible for the brokerage to "fill" your order without it ever reaching the exchanges, I think as long as it's inside the national bid-ask price spread at that moment. They pitch this as a feature - it also lets them avoid exchange fees. Then they can manage their overall risk separately.

Yes, I stopped trying to make those trades years ago. At one time though it was a remarkably consistent way to succeed on a small scale.

I'll admit I haven't looked at every broker, but every exchange that I know of, you have to opt in for orders to not go to the other exchanges.

This frequently is a feature for both sides of the equation due to lower fees, better execution rules, rebates, priority, etc.

I certainly know that I would never opt in to a platform that consistently provided worse execution (especially in the equities space where there are so many choices).