|
|
|
|
|
|
by rayiner
4689 days ago
|
|
|
That code is wrong. Its obvious why its wrong when you think about the closure representation. Forcing a developer to understand the implementation is not inconsistent with the C++ mentality (see: everything having to do with inheritance and parameter passing). |
|
|
I don't follow you. There's nothing inconsistent about allowing the closure representation to capture by reference. Indeed C++ allows this, if you write the appropriate capture clause.