[aminbandali]

With WordPress, there's always the possibility of your blog being hacked, because it executes queries and there's always the chance for bugs to exist some where in the huge ocean of code. On the other hand, with static blog generators (like specter, octopress, pelican, etc) your generated blog will be static html and as far as I know, there's no way you can really question html's security, simply because security doesn't apply to it. You cannot attack html because it doesn't run queries or anything, it's just static data being pulled from the server and displayed by the browser. So, in the end, the security goes back to your host and how good the machines are configured (when you're using shared hosts).

[pa5tabear]

Do you lose functionality without queries? I'm assuming static means there is less interactivity, like commenting.

[aminbandali]

Compared to WordPress, you definitely do; but think about it, there's lots of stuff in WordPress that a blogger doesn't need. WordPress is not just a blogging platform [anymore]. However, on the other hand, by using static sites you're entering a whole new level of security. But don't fear, for commenting, there's Disqus which is pretty good, and I think it's built into specter as well! Even if not so, adding it is just copying and pasting a couple of lines of code :)

[SkyMarshal]

Nah, just use Disqus for your comments. Octopress includes this by default, probably others as well.

I've been using static blogging for about a year now, it's great. Fast, simple, miss nothing from Blogger or Posterous, don't know about Wordpress never used it, and all your content is stored in your own Github repository.

[astrowilliam]

Commenting is a pretty big part of the blogging community. I'd hope it would be included in any blogging platform. But then again there are outside sources like disqus for comments so you can bolt that onto your posts if you feel inclined.