|
|
|
|
|
by argumentum
4687 days ago
|
|
I think you make good points .. and also that mattermark probably would agree. One problem is stats like you mentioned are hard to count, as for one you may have a competitive incentive to hide them. For another, there are no easy APIs or ways of scraping that data. What mattermark could do (and are probably doing) is learning what stats are signals of success for what types of startups. For a consumer web or mobile startup, mattermark's data is likely a very good health indicator, for a b2b thing likely not. |
|
A couple examples to play devil's advocate even when discussing consumer startups against other consumer startups: 1) The social media startup that relies on spammy incentives to retweet or like something. 2) The ecommerce startup that relies on free giveaways or hefty price cuts to get people to tweet or post deals that are not sustainable from a business perspective.
Unless there are other signals that you can combine with this data, in many instances it can be deceiving. Like I said, the data can still be a great starting point because you at least see the data ranked with the names of the startups and then can investigate those startups closer from other perspectives.