| > What does that mean for the user. Do batteries today last twice what they lasted 30 years ago? Nope. Are rechargeable batteries any more viable today? Nope. You are flat wrong on both counts. Modern batteries provide much more energy per size, weight and cost than their rechargeable predecessors. As to "viable", how can you make any kind of claim about batteries that didn't exist 30 years ago? > Even batteries in laptops only last a year or so before they are just dead and need replacing. Yes -- compared to no batteries and no laptops, 30 years ago. What kind of comparison do you think you're making? > If you think battery technology has really massively improved in the last 30 years, please let me know what real world improvements there have been... Today, batteries exist, and applications exist, that did not exist 30 years ago. Modern battery applications could not be filled by the technology that existed 30 years ago. How difficult is that to decode? Thirty years ago, the Tesla Model S could not exist, period, full stop. The battery technology didn't exist. Chart of battery energy density by year: http://www.akbars.net/images/battery%20energy%20density.png |
I'm actually thinking of going back to my nokia which has a battery that lasts a week on standby. Compared to modern smartphones which last a day.
You're right though - Inefficient bloated buggy software is becoming the driving force for requiring more power from batteries - going back to my original point - I don't want software running my car.
Agree to disagree eh