|
|
|
|
|
by SilliMon
4688 days ago
|
|
Not necessarily; few employees are willing to take a pay cut - that is why 5% of staff are laid off, rather than everyone in the company taking a 5% cut. The latter would probably be more efficient for the company. However many workers would start looking for a better job. |
|
A week later they made a billion dollar acquisition, and they still made a good profit.
Don't tell me that folks won't take a paycut. They'll take one, and be grateful!