[snitko]

It's not a good way to protest and people don't jump on that bandwagon simply because government is gonna make their lives very very unpleasant. That's why I say that I wouldn't advocate it - it is immoral to demand from people that they complicate their lives by engaging into a fight with IRS or whatever your tax agency is in your country. But essentially, taxes are forced payments. If it wasn't so, I guarantee you, 90% (if not more) would stop paying.

[oceanstone]

You bring up an interesting idea. What if taxes were completely voluntary... would anyone pay them? Would anyone elect to pay sales tax if it were not required? I feel like the world might resemble Mad Max if this were the case.

[snitko]

If taxes were voluntary, they wouldn't be taxes anymore, but rather payments for services. No one would have to elect anybody - not more so than we need to elect officials who decide which car everyone should buy - people would just start paying to service providers they like (includes police, fire department, education, law and yes, roads). As soon as this service provider stops doing a good job, people would stop paying. That would be a real accountability tied to actual profit, not to some vague promise by a government official who doesn't give a shit after he's elected.

And of course, the usual question - but what about the poor who can't afford it? Well, if a democratic system means that the majority of people agree that helping the poor is a good idea, I see nothing impossible in those very same people giving money to charities voluntarily, without any system forcing them to. Except that in a voluntary system the charities are also much more accountable than a government, because as soon as this charity fails to deliver what was promised, people stop donating.