|
|
|
|
|
by timr
6229 days ago
|
|
There have been a bunch of papers over the years, with varying levels of success. Here's a short one that tries pagerank on a set of physics papers: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/28/44/11103 Reading past the usual academic exaggeration (where everything is "promising" and "has potential"), the data is underwhelming -- there's no clear indication that pagerank has an advantage over traditional citation metrics. Here's a Google cache link to a paper that discusses some of the things I was talking about (i.e. how the metaphor breaks down when moving from web to journals): http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:KdKSGivmckgJ:www.cais-a... As I said, there have been lots of other papers. I don't recall seeing one that made a convincing case, but I'm certainly not an expert.... |
|