[szuhanchang]

How does the Citizens United ruling factor into this?

Basically, I'm wondering if a valid defense would be to say that although 3Taps as a company was banned from using Craigslist, individual employees and separate companies were not.

As a result, the subsequent retrievals of information by individual employees / a separate company out of their own volition and not using company resources constitute legal access of Craigslist.

The information legally gathered by the separate entities were then passed back to the company, so 3Taps never actually accessed Craigslist after the ban.

Would this work, and why / why not?