|
|
|
|
|
by screwt
4684 days ago
|
|
It's a bit of a bizarre analogy - I don't think it fits. The reason why the rudder is at the back rather than the front of a ship is the same as why a pendulum rests straight down, but a pencil won't balance straight up - stability. I can't really see any links between that situation and the one being described in the article. Not to say there aren't some good points being made - I think though the analogy being used distracts from, rather than adds to, these points. And yes, the lack of capitalization does make it harder to read. |
|
Also, many ships want/need to have the ability to steer both the front and the back of the boat. As an other reply already says, bow thrusters (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_thruster) are common in larger ships nowadays.
And yes, people have tried to build serious sailing boats with two true rudders:
http://articles.philly.com/1986-10-17/sports/26058791_1_radi...
I even could find a mention of a boat with only a front rudder: http://www.craigmarine.info/yacht_boat/builders/power_boat/B... (scroll down to 'Canard')
So, be a front rudder, but be good at it!