|
|
|
|
|
by mjolk
4697 days ago
|
|
This whole thing is passive aggressive, but the best part is: >"Google objected on a number of grounds. We took our app down and agreed to work with Google to solve their issues..We enabled Google’s advertisements, disabled video downloads and eliminated the ability for users to view reserved videos. We did this all at no cost to Google, which one would think would want a YouTube app on Windows Phone that would only serve to bring Google new users and additional revenue." "We stopped breaking Google's ToS at _no cost_ to Google" Cry me a river, Microsoft. |
|