Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mjolk 4697 days ago
This whole thing is passive aggressive, but the best part is:

>"Google objected on a number of grounds. We took our app down and agreed to work with Google to solve their issues..We enabled Google’s advertisements, disabled video downloads and eliminated the ability for users to view reserved videos. We did this all at no cost to Google, which one would think would want a YouTube app on Windows Phone that would only serve to bring Google new users and additional revenue."

"We stopped breaking Google's ToS at _no cost_ to Google"

Cry me a river, Microsoft.

1 comments

And after they stopped breaking Google's ToS, they decided to re-release the application that was breaking the ToS, and decided to cry foul on Google, for not liking that they re-released the old app.