Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MetaCosm 4690 days ago
I stopped working with a client already over this. Simply put, cash-flow wise I can't currently risk taxes and penalties. It turned a customer into a liability because of the horrible wording and unclear guidance (seriously, they want us to pro-rate by the % of our software used in the state?).

I suspect many other small start-ups will make the same choice we did until this all gets sorted out.
1 comments
grumps 4690 days ago
Out of curiosity - what made you feel that burden was placed on your company? From what I saw if you didn't have a MA tax ID and didn't have a physical presence in the state that burden would be placed on the purchaser.

Personally I read that it's kind of like sales tax, and buying online. If the seller doesn't do business in the state you reside it's up to the purchaser to pay the tax.

link
MetaCosm 4690 days ago
My lawyer was unable to assure me of this -- the law is terribly written. Due to the nature of the data worked on, I have to travel to MA and do a major component of the work on site.

My understanding is "rewording and clarifications" are coming. I know my client (employes hundreds of people) has unleashed a bit of hell over this -- we will see what will happen.

link