|
|
|
|
|
by gringofyx
4691 days ago
|
|
That's an interesting calculation. Using that formula, how would management like to compensate Joe given the following: * Steve is hired for $100k * A year passes * The company starts to lose money, let's say down to $1.5M a year. * It is decided that Joe's industry knowledge - and only Joe's knowledge - had been making extra money for the company. It was some non-transferrable knowledge. * Aside from the previous caveat, Steve and Joe had precisely the same skillset * Joe is happily employed somewhere else for $150k |
|