|
|
|
|
|
by invisible
4695 days ago
|
|
I, too, found it kind of odd. The bulk of the savings they achieved came from dropping support for the Chromium browser (since Chromium no longer relies on WebKit) and C++ 11. This was a really bizarre article because it had a lot of details about how to reduce the size of a C++ binary but not what that actually means to performance. What did that 6% binary size reduction buy them in startup time? 10ms? 300ms? What about memory consumption after startup? Did tests indicate that the memory locality had improved CPU performance in noticeable manner? |
|