Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by invisible 4695 days ago
I, too, found it kind of odd. The bulk of the savings they achieved came from dropping support for the Chromium browser (since Chromium no longer relies on WebKit) and C++ 11. This was a really bizarre article because it had a lot of details about how to reduce the size of a C++ binary but not what that actually means to performance.

What did that 6% binary size reduction buy them in startup time? 10ms? 300ms?

What about memory consumption after startup?

Did tests indicate that the memory locality had improved CPU performance in noticeable manner?