|
|
|
|
|
by bhauer
4694 days ago
|
|
To be clear, the particular test cited is expressly designed to exercise the framework and its ORM+database connectivity. None of our present test types permit the use of a reverse proxy cache because we are specifically interested in measuring the performance of the frameworks/platforms and not the performance of reverse proxy software; you can find such tests elsewhere. Further, reverse proxies are only suitable for a subset of real-world applications where it is acceptable to cache output for consumption by a wide audience. In other words, Rails wasn't unique in being tested without a preferred reverse proxy. Every single framework on that list was tested without a reverse proxy. A future test type [1] will exercise back-end caching (e.g., memcached in the case of Rails), but we are not planning to ever include reverse proxies (of any form) in the project. [1] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/37... |
|