Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by whatusername 4695 days ago
I think it's truer to say that PowerPC stalled in performance per watt. The high end Power7/Power8 chips are massively powerful but that comes with Power and Cooling requirements that aren't going to work in a laptop.
2 comments

Those post-date the G5 by several years, though. Things had gotten better for POWER by then, but it had already lost much of its market.
Kindof true. I'd forgotten how much of a Mhz bump the P6 was -- It came out 12 months after the first intel Mac Pro (and ran at 4.7Ghz at the high end).

The P5 was a contemporary of the G5 (although the G5 was really a P4). But it wasn't quite the beast the P6 was.

And the G5 (the PPC 970 in IBM's nomenclature) was an "ultra-light" POWER4 — the POWER5 was ~30% quicker than the G5. POWER never really fell behind at the high end — there was just no real focus on anything except the high-end.
The high end POWER stuff always had crazy cooling, though.