|
|
|
|
|
by incision
4694 days ago
|
|
I think the author is making a bad analogy and ignoring the general function of recommendations. Of course they're all positive and lacking nuance. It's one to one vouching that both parties agree to, not review or analysis. That said, I'd say they are certainly junk, just not necessarily for the reasons stated. As I see it, LinkedIn makes junk of itself by being way too cluttered with the products of non-stop demands to engage in all sorts of empty actions. LinkedIn is an ugly rolodex, not a network. |
|