[lobster_johnson]

First of all, in many cases this requires that such entities have interior access. If you can't inspect facilities but only the end product, you become very limited in what you can do.

Secondly, even then, all you can do is disseminate information. You can't enforce anything; you can only try to convince people to vote with their feet.

[smsm42]

A lot of people have "interior access", restaurants are not exactly highly classified CIA facilities. And any certification/review body can request - and obtain, if certification is worthy - such access, without any problem. Did you ever hear, for example, about Kosher certification? How do you think it can be done without access to everything? It can not. Whoever wants to sell on markets that need Kosher or Halal or any other such certification - provides access. Whoever does not - sells to people that don't care about this certification.

>>> Secondly, even then, all you can do is disseminate information. You can't enforce anything

You mean - you can't stop people from buying what they want even if you think it's bad for them, you can only give them information and let them decide for themselves if they're ok with it? Oh horror!!!

[lobster_johnson]

Sure. Kosher certification works because companies cooperate; but the network and trust has taken years and money to build, and it only works because there is enough critical mass in the system for a company to lose by not participating.

[smsm42]

So, you're saying if nobody among the consumers needs these certifications it wouldn't work. And you say it like it is a bad thing?

Of course, this means the government loses a way to enforce arbitrary restrictions that nobody of the consumers actually need but that promote some political or special interest agenda. Tell me please again, how is it a bad thing?