|
|
|
|
|
by dkhenry
4709 days ago
|
|
I don't think they need the content if They can identify the participants it works even better. """ I see in 2013 you had many long encrypted conversations with someone we now know to be a pedophile, what were you talking about exactly """ |
|
Also, that "OMG you were talking to a pedo!" threat doesn't mean much of the conversations were innocuous. To make that threat, they would need a good confidence that you couldn't (for whatever reason[1]) just turn over chat logs proving that nothing was amiss.
[1] E.g. The chat reveals something you want to keep hidden, even if it doesn't relate to the fact that the person is a paedophile, or maybe the logs just don't exist, etc.