|
|
|
|
|
by jessaustin
4710 days ago
|
|
An hour in, a complaint about icon-plagiarism-via-anonymous-bikeshedding-session is still the top comment on HN for a software project with ambitious technical goals. That in itself is a strong argument for doing one's own work and creating original icons. Assuming for the sake of discussion that Tox is or could be a technically superior solution, do they really want that obscured by this sort of extraneous bullshit? EDIT: and now I remember where I've heard that name before, as well: http://testrun.org/tox Perhaps a rebranding effort is in order? That sort of work seems to be right up /g/'s alley? Google is your friend! |
|
[+] [137 messages] "Bunch of people arguing about logo copyright & design for an open-source project."