|
|
|
|
|
by derefr
4713 days ago
|
|
> so the probability of doing something that requires less effort than everyone else and having a better livelihood than them seems, well, unlikely Tell that to everyone who is wealthy enough to live off their investment portfolio (or just savings-interest, which is implicitly a very low-volatility investment portfolio provided by the bank.) Tell that to trust-fund kids. Tell that to artists and musicians and writers who make their money off royalties. And, meanwhile, also tell that to the population of some cities in the US where business revenue is supported entirely by disability cheques[1]. There are a lot of people in this world who don't "work for a living"; the middle-class seems to have a mental block associated with imagining how they got there. [1] http://apps.npr.org/unfit-for-work/ |
|
The people you listed make up less than 1% of the population (unlikely by definition). As for people living off disability and SSI (social security income) checks, that only affords an average livelihood (or below).
The middle class mental block is how an economy can function if everyone (or most people) were to live from passive income. It is well understood that most "financially independent" had their good fortune through inheritance.