[wildwood]

If the workers are being classified as contractors, then it's important to have an arbitrary cut-off that limits how long they can work at your company. Otherwise some people can get kept on as contractors indefinitely, when they should have been re-coded as full-time employees.

Of course, this isn't a limit on length of employment, just a limit on the length of someone's employment as a contractor. Plenty of companies use more of a "contract to hire" approach, and make a decision whether or not to convert employees to full time at the end of the contract.

[smsm42]

Yes, I know this model - the company I work for has been using it quite successfully to hire candidates in some cases. But usually it is clear if the candidate is good or not in 2-3 months, so a limit at 11 months and firing successful workers because they reached 11 months and then hiring untrained workers for the same position seems strange. So I wondered what causes such behavior.