[toni]

Link-bait title from an obvious splog network about a company looking for any kind of PR.

From whom is that quote originating? Where is Apple's rejection letter? Which section of App Store guidelines they specifically violated?

Edit: the link was changed from a TNW piece to an admittedly better story at tech.co

[dannyr]

Treehouse itself was quoted in the post about Apple not allowing Android content.

[toni]

But "Treehouse" is a company. Usually a human at a company sends an email. Who in Treehouse sent that update? Because then we can ask him/her what section of App Store guidelines they were supposedly violating.

[hanley]

There was a better link posted earlier today with all the information you are requesting. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6103149

[alayne]

Was the Android content bundled? Could the app download it to work around the rule?

[JohnTHaller]

Considering that Apple has rejected books for containing links to competing websites, this isn't really a stretch.

[jasonlotito]

> Where is Apple's rejection letter?

Be careful assuming everything in a rejection takes place in the official rejection letter. It can also take place over the phone as well, where nothing gets written down.

[tmzt]

Or emails can be written and never sent...