[benatkin]

I was disappointed that it hadn't been closed. The first answer is a backhanded dig at non-angular developers saying that angular is about architecture and implying that the others aren't.

I like angular but "angular architect" rolls off the tongue too easily.

[jamesaguilar]

You're disappointed that a really informative answer has not been closed because of some subtext you've read into it that may or may not actually be there? That doesn't seem like a very productive attitude to me.

[benatkin]

Another google employee. You're just contributing to the mutual admiration society that's all over that answer and its comments.

[jamesaguilar]

The answer was made by a Google employee? Never knew.

[benatkin]

Actually, no, the person who wrote the so-called "answer" which is more like an essay (and therefore not a proper Stack Overflow response) isn't a google employee. I didn't mean to imply that.

[jamesaguilar]

OK, then I'm unclear on why you brought up my employer. Did it have something to do with my support of the answer in your mind? Like is Angular a Google project? Or was it just some random thing you could attack?

[benatkin]

That's funny. You rushed to Angular's defense without mentioning your financial connection and now you're annoyed that somebody else mentioned it.