Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pcwalton 4707 days ago
Reread the comment. It's a complaint about the lack of generics.
1 comments

Aka polymorphic function parameters. If I manage to abstract a bit of functionality into a function, I don't care what the type is as long as the operations within the function work on it. Haskell uses typeclasses to provide this guarantee for specific types. Go seems to try to do something like this with interfaces, but it doesn't seem to apply to the map/fold/filter style of programming