|
|
|
|
|
by fatdog789
6240 days ago
|
|
Except that the bank can also refuse to consider these transfers to be made "in error", given the vast publicity this has been given on the web. Indeed, given the fraudulent intent behind these transactions, the bank can simply keep the money (without forcing the intended recipient to swallow the costs of the transfer) to pay for its own costs in handling the transfer. On top of that, above a certain dollar limit (don't know what it is in this case), this gives the Swedish court jurisdiction for criminal charges for the mastermind, for bank fraud. |
|