|
|
|
|
|
by temphn
4712 days ago
|
|
You're so hostile that you kick the ball into your own net. My question was whether LME was free to "change" the rule by abolishing it, or whether this was related to an underlying CFTC compliance issue. Because trying to increase the stringency of the rule did nothing: Martin Abbott, the head of the exchange, said at the time
that he did not believe that the warehouse delays were
causing the problem. But the group tried to quiet the furor
by imposing new regulations that doubled the amount of
metal that the warehouses are required to ship each day —
from 1,500 tons to 3,000 tons. But few metal traders or
manufacturers believed that the move would settle the
issue.
This does not argue in favor of your tacit position that we just need more rules, or more men with guns to enforce them. |
|