|
|
|
|
|
by davedx
4717 days ago
|
|
I like the async test handling better than Jasmine. It's the first thing I look for in testing frameworks nowadays. I'm working on a simple lightweight framework at the moment that's designed to run on browsers in target environments such as VMs or cloud browsers, and a lot of my code deals with async issues. Moving to a promise-based system is definitely something I'm considering investigating. One pet peeve I have with all of these test frameworks though is the "kitchen sink" approach: there is always a substantial list of features. This led to me to roll my own. |
|