[olegbl]

Before: copy file to thumbdrive/cellphone. Now: take picture with cellphone.

[16s]

Collect cellphones at door. Put them in steel cabinet. When workers leave, they can get the phones on the way out.

[Jach]

But they'll never expect you to have two cellphones!

[nwombosi]

How about one of the microfilm devices they used to use in 60s spy movies?

[lelf]

You mean Google Glass?

[tomjen3]

Because no person has two cellphones.

[16s]

If you are willing to risk smuggling one in and are foolish enough to think they cannot detect the radio waves, then go for it.

[JackpotDen]

there is significant time overhead and increased visibility/decreased quality(in terms of usability) in this method. a 100 page document would take a long time to photograph, but not as long to transfer, and you'd be less visible.

[tonyedgecombe]

Not only that but you need to be physically present to take photos, that isn't the case where hacking is concerned.

[keeperofdakeys]

If you look at the last two "major" leaks (manning, snowden), they didn't involve any hacking at all. Employees simply abused their privileges to copy information.

[johnchristopher]

Yes, but that would make spy movie believable and thrilling again.